Click here to visit the online store:

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Happy Holidays!

Everybody realizes by now that the terribly offensive phrase Merry Christmas has been subtly removed from practically everything, and I will admit that I understand the reasoning. When I check out at a store and a person tells me "Happy Holidays" I politely respond with a "Merry Christmas." They have the right to say happy holidays, and I have the right to say merry Christmas. I disagree with the conscientious effort to remove references to Christmas (let's just be honest, holiday lights just sounds stupid; you don't decorate for the holidays, you decorate for Christmas), but there is a freedom of speech that cannot be ignored.

With that said, on the day after Christmas (excuse me, the day after holiday) someone told me "Happy New Year." Wait a minute, what if New Year offends me? It is no secret that I don't watch the ball drop or even stay up until midnight on New Year's Eve, so I shouldn't have to suffer through a cashier telling me to have a happy new year, should I?

If "happy holidays" is just a generic way of summing up all of the occasions of the season, then why are they allowed to specifically mention New Years? Let's just call it what it is and admit that this is an anti-Christian way of removing the birth of Christ from our culture.

If we cannot acknowledge Christmas, then why did I not get my mail on December 25th (or 24!)? If I were an atheist I would be a little offended that the government is honoring the holiday.

If we are going to be this immature as a nation then from now on there should be no more references to Valentine's Day, Martin Luther King Jr., Day, President's Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Memorial Day, or any other event. Either they are all merely holidays, or they are to be recognized for what they are. Christmas is a holy day, and whether society likes it or not, Jesus was born. The government tried to put a stop to it back then, so we should not expect anything different now.

Happy New Year!

(Read Christmas Music and Was Jesus Born on December25th?)

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Christians and Gay Rights


Christians have historically opposed giving rights to homosexuals--rights such as marriage, adoption, and service in the military. However, there is a new group rising up out of Christian circles that are calling for more rights to be given to homosexuals. They cite the command from Jesus to love their neighbor as they love themselves, and what better way to show love to a homosexual than by allowing them to get married and adopt children?

The first thing to point out is that all groups who believe the Bible is the Word of God should believe that homosexuality is a sin (Levitcus 18:22; 20:13; Romans 1:26-32; I Corinthians 6:9) . But to what extent are we to show love to them, or to any sinner for that matter?

In our culture if a pastor says that a homosexual needs to repent it is considered to be hate speech, and if a politician promises the right of marriage it is considered to be an act of love. We must realize how backwards that is. As a pastor, if I try to show a homosexual love by saying, "Get married, adopt children, be happy", what I am really saying is "Have fun in hell." To push for more rights and not tell them about their sin is the ultimate hate speech. This is the same as a doctor not telling his patient that he has cancer because he doesn't want to offend him. Ignorance is not bliss; it is certain death.

If you want to show true love to a homosexual explain to him the consequences of dying without having surrendered his life to Christ--you never even have to mention homosexuality! He must deny himself, repent of all sin, and follow Christ as his Lord. The same is true of heterosexuals living in sin. All sin leads to death and hell, and must be repented of.

One final thought: just because we want to show love to someone in blatant sin does not mean we take steps to condone what they do. Why don't we show love to axe murders and serial rapists by letting them live among society, own axes, and work in day cares? Jesus showed sinners love by demanding repentance and warning of their impending doom if they failed to do so. Where does the post modern crowd get the idea that Jesus went around high-fiving sinners and laughing at their dirty jokes?

Instead, every recorded exchange between Jesus and those who opposed Him shows that He was forceful, not friendly, to them. He called them vipers, snakes, hypocrites, sinners, and children of the devil. He used sarcasm, blunt language, and twice used a whip. Today a person preaching like that would be decried as extreme, a legalist, or flat out crazy. Jesus would not support homosexual marriage (just ask the citizens of Sodom and Gomorrahoh; oh wait; you cant); we need more preachers standing up today in opposition to sin, not accepting it as part of our culture.

So if you know a homosexual then show them love today. Do not do this by telling them God loves them, because this just gives them a false sense of security ("If God loves me then why do I need to change?"). Tell them of the reality of hell, and as Jude said, pull them out of the fire. They might get upset, but if you never have the conversation, they will be upset with you for all eternity, wishing you would have really shown them love.

**Also note: Romans 1 closes by saying that those who condone homosexuality are as guilty as those who practice it, and Paul says both groups are deserving of death.

(Read Should Christians Vote for Gay Rights?)