Skip to main content

Should Christians Vote Part 2: Aren't All Leaders Appointed by God Anyway?


One of the arguments against Christians getting involved in the political process is that God is the one who appoints our leaders. This idea comes from Romans 13:1, which says that there is no ruler that was not established by God.

While I certainly agree with that verse 100%, that doesn’t mean that God is in favor of each ruler. Let’s revisit a dark time in Israel’s history.

Israel never had a king before because their king reigned from heaven. God had established the priesthood and His prophets, as well as the judges, to lead His people, and the last of these judges was Samuel. When Samuel was getting old and near the end of his life, the Israelites began to ask for a king.

They wanted to be just like everyone else.

Samuel asked them if they would jump off a cliff if everyone did (not quite, but it was a similar exchange), but they insisted on having a king. God told Samuel to tell them what a king would be like, and here is the description that Samuel relayed to the people:

He will take your sons and put them in his army and make them drive his chariots; he will harvest your fields for his food; he will take your daughters and make them cook for him; he will take your cattle and put them to work and use them to feed his entourage.

But the people still wanted a king. Samuel went back to the Lord, who acknowledged that the people were rejecting Him, and God told Samuel to give the people what they wanted. Even though the Lord was going to establish a king, He was going to wait for David, who was a man after God’s heart. Instead, Israel got Saul, who was a terrible king that was soon rejected by God.

So did God appoint Saul? Yes, but does that mean that Saul was God’s plan? No.

Sometimes God steps back and says, “If you want it so badly, just do it.” Just as Romans 1 records God releasing people to follow their own sinful passions, so I Samuel 8 records God giving the people the king they wanted.

If a candidate is elected with a majority vote, then the people are getting what they ask for. We can’t blame God for the poor job that Saul did, and we can’t blame Him if we elect an ungodly leader. In God’s sovereignty He allows rulers to come to the throne, but that doesn’t mean they are there with His blessing.


So get out there and vote, and realize that your vote makes a difference. 

Comments

The next blogs will begin to look at the issues.
Philip said…
Good point Tommy Mann.. Thanks for these blogs
Thank you Philip. I enjoy doing it. On Thursday I will put up Part 3 on abortion and stem cell research, and the next one will be on war and the death penalty.
Anonymous said…
Perhaps you might consider an alternative view? There's much that you've overlooked in your series on Christians and voting. Check out: "Blood Guilt: Christian Responses to America's War on Terror" (New Covenant Press, 2011)
Anonymous,

Thank you for your comment. I won’t be getting around to reading that book you suggested in the near future (although I will check it out), so if there is something that I have “overlooked” would you mind telling me here?

And yes, I would consider an alternate view. Anonymous commenters here frequently suggest that I have never read a dissenting viewpoint from my own, but they fail to realize that my viewpoint is shaped by reading many differing opinions. By the book title you suggested I’m assuming that you are referring to war, but as I stated in the blog Should Christians Vote for War or Capital Punishment (http://tommycmann.blogspot.com/2012/01/should-christians-vote-for-war-or.html), I believe in just wars. However, I have read Compollo (http://tommycmann.blogspot.com/2010/07/can-we-be-americans-and-christians-tony.html), Claiborne, McClaren, Miller, and others who believe that there is never a cause for war.

Brian McClaren has rightly pointed out that countries expand their borders through “bullets and bombs,” and I am opposed to that; the war on terror is not about America’s Manifest Destiny, but about being peacemakers to the victims of evil despots (Hussein, for example, murdered millions before he was brought to justice through this just war, and he would have murdered hundreds of thousands more).

Anti-war Christians like to talk about being peacemakers, but holding up images of the peace symbol doesn’t bring peace to Afghanistan; bombs and bullets have. If the anti-war movement prevailed then bin Laden and Hussein would be alive today murdering a dozen people per day over another few decades; where is the peacemaking and the social justice there?

So yes, I would be open to hearing an alternate opinion, but that doesn’t mean that I will change by belief.

Popular posts from this blog

The “Christians Hate Gays” Myth

During these Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) hearings before the Supreme Court I keep hearing how much Christians hate gay people. This was news to me since I am a Christian and I don’t hate gay people. I also go to church with over 1000 other Christians, and if any of them hate gay people, they sure haven’t told me. Before moving to South Carolina I worked at or attended several churches in Texas; prior to that I spent a decade going to church in Florida. Guess what? No one hated gay people. In fact, I don’t know any Christians who hate anybody. The very uniform of a believer is his love, and if a person does not show consistent love, then he is not actually a believer. Are there non-believers who hate gay people and claim to be Christian? Of course. But that doesn’t represent Jesus or His church. Equating  hateful sign-wavers with Christianity is like equating a kindergarten baseball team to the New York Yankees. They may claim to be playing the same

To Save a Life

(Like my blog about the peace symbol, this blog was written as a default response to all the parents, students, and other people who are asking my opinion of To Save a Life.) By now you have probably heard of the movie To Save a Life, which opened nation-wide in theaters on January 22nd. The movie deals with so many issues that teens face today, like suicide, cutting, drinking, drugs, premarital sex, teen pregnancy, and abortion. At first glance this movie looks like an awesome resource that we should recommend for our teens, parents, youth pastors, and youth workers. But a closer look at the movie reveals a few disturbing things. For starters, according to pluggedin.com, there are 2 uses of the “A” word, 5 uses of hell (used as a curse word), and once the “D” word is used. There are other crude terms used to describe a girl, and crude terms for referring to sexual activity. There is also a bedroom scene that shows a girl removing a boy’s shirt, then afterwards the girl putting he

The Rose of Sharon and Lily of the Valley

If you have spent much time in church you have probably sung some songs with lyrics like these: “He leads me to his banqueting table, his banner over me is love… Jesus is the rock of my salvation, his banner over me is love.” “Sweetest rose of Sharon, come to set us free.” “He’s the lily of the valley, the bright and morning star…” But are those songs biblical? They come out of the writings of the Song of Solomon, but are we to understand those lines as describing Christ? The Song of Solomon is a collection of love poems that were written between two people who were deeply in love and about to be married. While we know that King Solomon is one of the writers, the other’s name has escaped us, and we know her today simply as the Shulamite woman. Some people believe that since this woman is not named then she never existed; some teach that this book is pure allegory, only existing to serve as symbolism. King Solomon, they say, represents