Skip to main content

What is Truth? Part 1



“What is truth?” Pilate asked sarcastically.

Jesus was on trial, and He explained to Pilate that He had come to “bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth hears my voice (John 8:37).” Pilate laughed off Jesus as if to say, “Can you really know the truth?”

That same attitude has become the rhetorical question of many of the new churches today. Churches are billing themselves as “church for people who don’t like church” or places where “we don’t have it figured out.” The traditional churches that read and believe the Bible have come under fire for being arrogant knowers of theology, while these newer emerging churches boast of not knowing what the Bible is really all about.

Sound doctrine has been replaced with fluidity, black and white issues are now in color, truth is not knowable, the Gospel is a mystery, and the commands of Scripture take a backseat to each person’s story.

I will be the first to admit that the emerging church has rightly criticized those who “believe” without knowing why. I stress that each Christian should know what they believe and why they believe it, and to say that “my pastor says” or “my church says” is not sufficient. We need to say, “the Bible says.”

Socrates was executed for being an atheist, when in reality he was an agnostic who got in trouble for asking tough questions. Kierkegaard decided to become a “Christian Socrates,” to ask tough questions to know why Christians believe what they believe. [i]

But the emerging church seems to go a step too far and demonize the ones who know both what they believe and why they believe it. Truth, they say, is something that is unattainable.

Here is how we arrived where we are:

Ancient philosophers just assumed that truth was a reality, a sort of common sense. But then, with the rise of men like Socrates, along with Aristotle, and Plato, philosophy began to try to define truth through nature. Next, men like Descartes, Kant, and Locke began to teach that truth comes through reason, experience, or both. This was the age of the Enlightenment.

Enlightenment gave way to Modernity, which believes that truth can be discovered only through the scientific method. Men like Marx, Darwin, and Nietzche championed this cause, but ultimately have all been disproven. That brings us now to Post-Modernity, which holds that truth, therefore, is not knowable. [ii]

That is a fine theme for philosophy, for philosophy isn’t really known for its accuracy anyway. Where this becomes a problem is when pastors have taken up the postmodern claim that they cannot know truth.

Let’s go back to Pilate’s question: What is truth?

According to Jesus, His Word is truth. Consider what the Bible has to say about truth.

“Sanctify them by Your Word; Your Word is truth (John 17:17).”
“You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free (John 8:32).”
“I am…the truth (Jesus in John 14:6).”
God is the “God of truth (Deut.32:4, Ps. 31:5, Is. 65:16).”
It warns of those who change “the truth of God into a lie (Romans 1:25).”
“The sum of thy Word is truth (Psalm 119:160).”
“Lead me into truth and teach me (Psalm 25:5).”
Ephesians 1:13-14 says that Jesus brought “the word of truth” that brings salvation.
Jesus is “full of grace and truth (John 1:14).”
The Holy Spirit will lead believers into truth (John 16:13)

This is only a portion of the verses that refer to God and His Word as being truth. For the Christian this means that, no matter what philosophy says, we can know absolute truth if we stand on the timeless truth of the Bible, and its great subject Jesus Christ.

(Read Part 2 here )


[i] Caputo, John D., Philosophy and Theology, Abingdon Press, chapter 1
[ii] MacArthur, John, The Truth War, Thomas Nelson, chapter 1

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The “Christians Hate Gays” Myth

During these Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) hearings before the Supreme Court I keep hearing how much Christians hate gay people. This was news to me since I am a Christian and I don’t hate gay people. I also go to church with over 1000 other Christians, and if any of them hate gay people, they sure haven’t told me. Before moving to South Carolina I worked at or attended several churches in Texas; prior to that I spent a decade going to church in Florida. Guess what? No one hated gay people. In fact, I don’t know any Christians who hate anybody. The very uniform of a believer is his love, and if a person does not show consistent love, then he is not actually a believer. Are there non-believers who hate gay people and claim to be Christian? Of course. But that doesn’t represent Jesus or His church. Equating  hateful sign-wavers with Christianity is like equating a kindergarten baseball team to the New York Yankees. They may claim to be playing the same

To Save a Life

(Like my blog about the peace symbol, this blog was written as a default response to all the parents, students, and other people who are asking my opinion of To Save a Life.) By now you have probably heard of the movie To Save a Life, which opened nation-wide in theaters on January 22nd. The movie deals with so many issues that teens face today, like suicide, cutting, drinking, drugs, premarital sex, teen pregnancy, and abortion. At first glance this movie looks like an awesome resource that we should recommend for our teens, parents, youth pastors, and youth workers. But a closer look at the movie reveals a few disturbing things. For starters, according to pluggedin.com, there are 2 uses of the “A” word, 5 uses of hell (used as a curse word), and once the “D” word is used. There are other crude terms used to describe a girl, and crude terms for referring to sexual activity. There is also a bedroom scene that shows a girl removing a boy’s shirt, then afterwards the girl putting he

Famous Frauds in Homosexual Science Part 2: Twin Studies

A second piece of shoddy science has been heralded as proving people are born gay. This time, instead of cadavers, living twins were studied. This study compared male identical twins to male fraternal twins; in each set of twins, at least one man was homosexual. 22% of the fraternal twins showed both brothers to be gay, compared to 52% of the identical twins. Since identical twins are closer genetically than fraternal twins, this study claimed that genetics play in to homosexuality, or that people are born gay. But an obvious question that arose from this study is, why did 48% of the identical twins only have one gay brother? If they are so close genetically, then 100% of the identical twins should have two gay brothers. This study does more harm than good to the argument from genetics. There are other factors to be considered. One is that the men doing the study (Richard Pillard and Michael Bailey) could have intentionally picked fraternal twins that the