Skip to main content

Catechism #14

Q. What is sin?

A. Sin is disobeying or not conforming to God’s law in any way.

Sin is a word that is used a lot in our churches. “That is sin,” we tell people. Or, “Don’t do that—its sinful.” Sin is failure to conform ourselves to God’s law, or simply put, it is disobeying God.

We like to tell the children at church that sin is anything we think, say, or do that makes God unhappy. I know the thought of an unhappy God is unpopular these days, but it is true. Do you think sin makes God happy? Do you think He is neutral toward sin? That only leaves one alternative.

Both Testaments are peppered with verses that refer to or allude to God’s wrath toward sin. The Old Testament recounts stories of God’s wrath on display toward the complaining and idolatry of Israel; the New Testament tells us “the wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all ungodliness (sin)…(Romans 1:18).”

God loves us, but He hates sin.

There are two ways we can sin: we can either commit an act (commission) or fail to commit an act (omission). I Thessalonians 4:3 says, “For this is the will of God: your sanctification, that you abstain from fornication.” According to this verse, fornication is a sinful act that we commit, either in our minds or with our bodies.

But failure to do something we know to be right is also sin. James 4:17 tells us, “To him that knows to do good, and does not do it, to him it is sin.” When we choose not to love our neighbor as ourselves (Matthew 22:39), choose to not to meet a need when we have the means (I John 3:17), or choose to rob God by withholding our tithes and offerings (Malachi 3:8), we are sinning by omission.

Sin is a part of our human nature that has been here since the curse. We will not achieve sinless perfect while on earth, but that should not keep us from trying to sin as little as possible.

What shall we say then? Should we go on sinning so that grace may abound? By no means! How can we who have died to sin live any longer in it?

Romans 6:1-2

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The “Christians Hate Gays” Myth

During these Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) hearings before the Supreme Court I keep hearing how much Christians hate gay people. This was news to me since I am a Christian and I don’t hate gay people. I also go to church with over 1000 other Christians, and if any of them hate gay people, they sure haven’t told me. Before moving to South Carolina I worked at or attended several churches in Texas; prior to that I spent a decade going to church in Florida. Guess what? No one hated gay people. In fact, I don’t know any Christians who hate anybody. The very uniform of a believer is his love, and if a person does not show consistent love, then he is not actually a believer. Are there non-believers who hate gay people and claim to be Christian? Of course. But that doesn’t represent Jesus or His church. Equating  hateful sign-wavers with Christianity is like equating a kindergarten baseball team to the New York Yankees. They may claim to be playing the same

To Save a Life

(Like my blog about the peace symbol, this blog was written as a default response to all the parents, students, and other people who are asking my opinion of To Save a Life.) By now you have probably heard of the movie To Save a Life, which opened nation-wide in theaters on January 22nd. The movie deals with so many issues that teens face today, like suicide, cutting, drinking, drugs, premarital sex, teen pregnancy, and abortion. At first glance this movie looks like an awesome resource that we should recommend for our teens, parents, youth pastors, and youth workers. But a closer look at the movie reveals a few disturbing things. For starters, according to pluggedin.com, there are 2 uses of the “A” word, 5 uses of hell (used as a curse word), and once the “D” word is used. There are other crude terms used to describe a girl, and crude terms for referring to sexual activity. There is also a bedroom scene that shows a girl removing a boy’s shirt, then afterwards the girl putting he

Famous Frauds in Homosexual Science Part 2: Twin Studies

A second piece of shoddy science has been heralded as proving people are born gay. This time, instead of cadavers, living twins were studied. This study compared male identical twins to male fraternal twins; in each set of twins, at least one man was homosexual. 22% of the fraternal twins showed both brothers to be gay, compared to 52% of the identical twins. Since identical twins are closer genetically than fraternal twins, this study claimed that genetics play in to homosexuality, or that people are born gay. But an obvious question that arose from this study is, why did 48% of the identical twins only have one gay brother? If they are so close genetically, then 100% of the identical twins should have two gay brothers. This study does more harm than good to the argument from genetics. There are other factors to be considered. One is that the men doing the study (Richard Pillard and Michael Bailey) could have intentionally picked fraternal twins that the