Skip to main content

Columbus Day


I’ll be honest: I’m not really sure what to make of Columbus Day. I know I’m not alone. Most Americans know little about holidays if they are not accompanied by a paid day off.

Are we supposed to hail Columbus as a hero? He got lost, “discovered” a new land that was already occupied, claimed it for his country, then began to sell the natives as slaves in Spain. He thought he was in India, so he incorrectly labeled the Native Americans as Indians. That mishap still confuses people today.

My grandfather is part Indian. No, no, not the kind from India. The real kind.

 Still, I’m glad that Columbus’ discovery was made, for it opened the door for the Puritans and Separatists to come here peacefully in search of religious freedom. This is separate from the merchants who came here for prosperity and killed the Indians. No, no, not the kind from India. Columbus forced the natives to convert to Catholicism, which was the very reason the Puritans and Separatists wanted to leave Europe—State run religion and conformity to the Catholic (not Christian) Church.

No matter what you might think of Columbus or the day named in his honor, it reminds me of one important fact. In the days of exploration in which Columbus lived, Earth was believed to have been flat. To Columbus’ credit, he was willing to risk his life in favor of a round planet.

Leaving Spain and heading east, Columbus thought he would eventually circumnavigate the globe and end up in India. And he would have, had the Western Hemisphere not stood in his way. When his vessel anchored down in North America, Columbus initially thought he had sailed all the way around the world and reached India.

This erroneous thinking still led to an accurate realization: the world wasn’t flat. The reason it took fourteen hundred and ninety-two years to come to this conclusion was explorers were afraid they would sail off the edge of Earth and fall to their doom.

This seems foolish to us today. For one thing, hindsight is 20/20. But more importantly, the Bible had already announced that Earth is round. In the Bible’s oldest book, Job records how God, “drew a circular horizon on the face of the waters, at the boundary of light and darkness (26:10),” and “He stretches out the north over empty space. He hangs the earth on nothing (v.7).” Furthermore, Isaiah 40:22 says God, “formed the circle of the earth.”

Just imagine if today’s Darwinian evolutionists lived back then:

Christians hate science!

People who go to school more go to church less.

You believe your fairy tales; we’ll stick with the truth.

We have the facts. We win.

Hey Christians, if the earth is flat, why does your Bible call the earth a circle, huh? LOL!

Teach flat earth science in the schools! Enough of these round earth kooks!

Want me to do a few more? OK, I’ll stop. The point is, when science and the Bible are at odds, don’t cower or cave for fear of looking stupid. I can’t stand when Christians sell out and embrace an old earth just because loud evolutionists say the debate is over.


On Columbus Day let’s remember that the Bible, not popular opinion or science, was right. Let it reinforce our belief in the inerrancy of Scripture, which certainly includes the Bible’s opening sentence.

Comments

Not being unknown is not the same as common knowledge. It was most certainly not the majority opinion in 1492 that the Earth was round. I never said there was no other opinion. In fact, my whole point was that some Christians believed Earth to be round while the MAJORITY of others believed it to be flat. One person's calculation does not change the validity of my point.

I just read your link (I'm assuming you're the same person who tells me I don't understand science and then posts other people's words). Two things come to mind. First, the opening quote from Bolenius confirms my point, that most of Columbus' contemporaries believed in a flat Earth. Even though the author of the blog says Columbus wasn't the only one who believed in a round planet, he was certainly in the minority.

Second, the blogger's own conclusion confirms my point. In the final paragraph he concedes that Columbus had to "convince" others that they could make the trip. Your comment and link did nothing to change my post. All you did was point out one person who believed in a round Earth, which I also said in my post.

Popular posts from this blog

The “Christians Hate Gays” Myth

During these Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) hearings before the Supreme Court I keep hearing how much Christians hate gay people. This was news to me since I am a Christian and I don’t hate gay people. I also go to church with over 1000 other Christians, and if any of them hate gay people, they sure haven’t told me. Before moving to South Carolina I worked at or attended several churches in Texas; prior to that I spent a decade going to church in Florida. Guess what? No one hated gay people. In fact, I don’t know any Christians who hate anybody. The very uniform of a believer is his love, and if a person does not show consistent love, then he is not actually a believer. Are there non-believers who hate gay people and claim to be Christian? Of course. But that doesn’t represent Jesus or His church. Equating  hateful sign-wavers with Christianity is like equating a kindergarten baseball team to the New York Yankees. They may claim to be playing the same

Famous Frauds in Homosexual Science Part 2: Twin Studies

A second piece of shoddy science has been heralded as proving people are born gay. This time, instead of cadavers, living twins were studied. This study compared male identical twins to male fraternal twins; in each set of twins, at least one man was homosexual. 22% of the fraternal twins showed both brothers to be gay, compared to 52% of the identical twins. Since identical twins are closer genetically than fraternal twins, this study claimed that genetics play in to homosexuality, or that people are born gay. But an obvious question that arose from this study is, why did 48% of the identical twins only have one gay brother? If they are so close genetically, then 100% of the identical twins should have two gay brothers. This study does more harm than good to the argument from genetics. There are other factors to be considered. One is that the men doing the study (Richard Pillard and Michael Bailey) could have intentionally picked fraternal twins that the

The Rose of Sharon and Lily of the Valley

If you have spent much time in church you have probably sung some songs with lyrics like these: “He leads me to his banqueting table, his banner over me is love… Jesus is the rock of my salvation, his banner over me is love.” “Sweetest rose of Sharon, come to set us free.” “He’s the lily of the valley, the bright and morning star…” But are those songs biblical? They come out of the writings of the Song of Solomon, but are we to understand those lines as describing Christ? The Song of Solomon is a collection of love poems that were written between two people who were deeply in love and about to be married. While we know that King Solomon is one of the writers, the other’s name has escaped us, and we know her today simply as the Shulamite woman. Some people believe that since this woman is not named then she never existed; some teach that this book is pure allegory, only existing to serve as symbolism. King Solomon, they say, represents