Skip to main content

DNC: Pro-Abortion, Pro-Gay Marriage, Anti-God




When the Democrat National Convention kicked off this week they approved the party platform for the next four years. As usual, the right to abortion on demand was included in the platform, but this year there were two first-time changes.

The first was the addition of gay marriage. This has never been a part of any party’s platform in the United States, and quite frankly, would not be a part of this year's if our president and vice president didn’t both suddenly switch their positions just three months ago, citing the sitcom Will and Grace as being foundational to the switch.

The other shocking change was not what was included, but rather in what was left out of the platform. The words God and Jerusalem were both omitted, causing quite a stir among both parties. In the past both parties have included in their platform that they believe that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel, which might not sound like a big deal, but it is the Muslims’ position to not recognize Jerusalem. By leaving out Jerusalem from the platform the Democrats were in essence embracing Muslim theology.  

That is what makes the omission of God an even bigger deal. In 2008 the DNC had a single reference to God, while in 2004 there were seven; that there were zero this year should not have come as a surprise since the party was obviously moving slowly towards that end.

The platform language that was omitted this year was an encouragement for Americans to “make the most of their God-given potential.” Even that language from 2008 appeared to be merely a token reference to God to satisfy Jews and Christians within the party.

As you get ready to cast your vote in November this is something important to keep in mind. President Obama has insulted Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu when he didn’t know his mic was on, and he has publicly encouraged Israel to recede back to their pre-1949 borders; in other words, he is suggesting that they give their rightful [“Promised”] Land to the Arabs. Secretary of State Clinton has made similar anti-Semitic remarks off camera, and Vice President Biden, well, he has insulted every ethnic group out there. 

Two days after approving the new platform, the party chairman came back and called for a vote to reinstate the language from previous years. Needing a two-thirds majority to pass the update, the chairman had to call for a vote three times. In each vote the nays were either tied with or louder than the yeas, but there was never a two-thirds majority. The motion carried anyway, because that is what the chairman was clearly told had to happen to limit the damage that had been done.

This blog is not about Republican vs. Democrat, or about trying to tell anyone how to vote. If the Republicans had behaved this way then I would be writing the same article about them. This is not a red state/blue state issue; this is about who we are as Christians. I encourage everyone to watch the movie Monumental and then you will understand why I have written this.

I’m not saying that there are no Christian Democrats or that all Republicans are Christians. What I am saying is that we need to take a long, hard look before we cast our vote.

You might consider voting Democrat because you are interested in green initiatives or some social cause, but you cannot get around the fact that you will also be voting for your taxes to pay for abortion, for gay marriage legislation, and to further violate the Abrahamic covenant between the US and Israel. 

This Administration is the most powerful foe to Israel that America has ever produced. It is also the biggest defender of taxpayer-funded abortion, including for minors with no parental consent, and the first to publicly push for gay marriage.

One thing is clear: the party didn’t need to leave the word God out of the platform. Their actions did that long before the platform was written. 





(Related Blog Series: Should Christians Vote?)

Comments

Anonymous said…
Tommy,

I love you man, but this is frankly terrible. Hopefully you understand that the Abrahamic Covenant was not "between the US and Israel." I'm assuming that was an oversight or a typo. The Abrahamic Covenant was between God and his covenant people, into whom we Gentiles have been grafted. All of God's promises find their yes in Jesus (2 Cor. 1:20) Jesus is the seed promised to Abraham and the Promised Land promised to God's covenant people. There is no covenant between God and the modern, secular nation-state of Israel, which was founded in 1948. Nor has God bestowed any special favor on this secular nation. God does not bless modern nations on the basis of whether they ally with secular Israel, but on the basis of their relationship to God's covenant people (Jew and Gentile united). This bad dispensational theology (which incidentally didn't pop up till the nineteenth century; hardly historic, biblical theology) has produced so much wackiness in the twentieth century, both theologically and politically. It makes Christians sound much more like political zealots with a Zionist agenda, than followers of Jesus who have renounced political power as the means of spiritual and cultural renewal.

For a helpful analysis of the flaws of Dispensationalism, check out the book, "Christ of the Covenants," by O. Palmer Robertson.
You say you love me, but I don't think you know me. I went to your site and it doesn't look like I know you. However, I am glad you found me and appreciate your comment.

I don't appreciate that you referred to this as "frankly terrible" and "bad dispensational theology." I think you have gone overboard and missed my point.

The Abrahamic covenant is wider than you might think. God's promise of "I will bless them that bless you and curse them that curse you" certainly applies to the United States. I am not of the persuasion that the US is central to any prophecy, but I believe that God's blessing on this unique nation is grounded in the fact that we have been friends of Israel from our earliest days.

I understand your position, but you are focusing in on a narrow point. My blog is about the general moving away from Christianity as evidenced by abortion on demand and same sex rights, and the removal of the word God from the platform.

Anonymous said…
You know me bro. I'm Ian Wheeler. I wasn't trying to be an anonymous detractor.
Please don't take my comments personally. I just think some of the points you made were terrible and that dispensational theology is screwy (though there are a great many Christians I love and respect that buy it). I do love you and wish the best for you, your family and your ministry. Just saw this topic as ripe for robust dialogue and friendly disagreement.

God bless!
Ian Wheeler? Why didn't you say so? Good to hear from you. I didn't take it personally, but I do get the anonymous detractors that annoy me from time to time. You are one of the most brilliant people I know, and like I said, I see your point.

With that said, the Middle East is filled with countries that produce oil and natural gas and export it all over the world while they still live in poverty and have no indoor plumbing. On the other hand, America has enough oil to be the Sadi Arabia of the West, and we refuse to use it. Meanwhile we are still the richest nation that ever existed, even after giving billions of dollars to the poor countries mentioned above.

America "blesses" Israel and those Middle Eastern countries" curse" Israel. I realize that financial prosperity and indoor plumbing are not guarantees of the Lord's blessing, but it sure seems to me that the Abrahamic Covenant is true. God has blessed us for hundreds of years because of our friendship with Israel, and nations that are constantly at war with them have seemingly been cursed for centuries.
Anonymous said…
Tommy,

I'd like to continue the conversation without spamming your comment thread. What's your email address?
Lol, tommy@philippibaptistchurch.com

Popular posts from this blog

The “Christians Hate Gays” Myth

During these Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) hearings before the Supreme Court I keep hearing how much Christians hate gay people. This was news to me since I am a Christian and I don’t hate gay people. I also go to church with over 1000 other Christians, and if any of them hate gay people, they sure haven’t told me. Before moving to South Carolina I worked at or attended several churches in Texas; prior to that I spent a decade going to church in Florida. Guess what? No one hated gay people. In fact, I don’t know any Christians who hate anybody. The very uniform of a believer is his love, and if a person does not show consistent love, then he is not actually a believer. Are there non-believers who hate gay people and claim to be Christian? Of course. But that doesn’t represent Jesus or His church. Equating  hateful sign-wavers with Christianity is like equating a kindergarten baseball team to the New York Yankees. They may claim to be playing the same

Famous Frauds in Homosexual Science Part 2: Twin Studies

A second piece of shoddy science has been heralded as proving people are born gay. This time, instead of cadavers, living twins were studied. This study compared male identical twins to male fraternal twins; in each set of twins, at least one man was homosexual. 22% of the fraternal twins showed both brothers to be gay, compared to 52% of the identical twins. Since identical twins are closer genetically than fraternal twins, this study claimed that genetics play in to homosexuality, or that people are born gay. But an obvious question that arose from this study is, why did 48% of the identical twins only have one gay brother? If they are so close genetically, then 100% of the identical twins should have two gay brothers. This study does more harm than good to the argument from genetics. There are other factors to be considered. One is that the men doing the study (Richard Pillard and Michael Bailey) could have intentionally picked fraternal twins that the

The Rose of Sharon and Lily of the Valley

If you have spent much time in church you have probably sung some songs with lyrics like these: “He leads me to his banqueting table, his banner over me is love… Jesus is the rock of my salvation, his banner over me is love.” “Sweetest rose of Sharon, come to set us free.” “He’s the lily of the valley, the bright and morning star…” But are those songs biblical? They come out of the writings of the Song of Solomon, but are we to understand those lines as describing Christ? The Song of Solomon is a collection of love poems that were written between two people who were deeply in love and about to be married. While we know that King Solomon is one of the writers, the other’s name has escaped us, and we know her today simply as the Shulamite woman. Some people believe that since this woman is not named then she never existed; some teach that this book is pure allegory, only existing to serve as symbolism. King Solomon, they say, represents