This often-used example shows how desperate defenders of
evolution are when it comes to finding facts.
A real scientist understands the difference between
macroevolution and microevolution. Microevolution is something we see all the
time—its responsible for different breeds of dogs, for example. Microevolution is
changing within a species.
Macroevolution, which is akin to Darwinism, is changing from one species to another. This where
missing links come in. Someone remind the scientific community that they haven’t
found any missing links yet after 160 years of looking.
Just to be clear, the evolution of the flu is an example of
microevolution. Until the flu evolves into chicken pox (or a chicken) it will
never prove Darwinism.
Comments