Skip to main content

Yes, I Eat Shellfish



Yes, I do eat shellfish. Thank you for asking.

And to answer your next few questions, I also wear mixed fabric, I do not have a beard, and I thoroughly enjoy bacon.

I’m making these answers public because they keep coming up, usually as anonymous comments on my blog. It is the classic atheist defense. Thinking they know the Bible because some liberal professor or friend has pointed out a passage in Leviticus, they use these commands to justify their atheism, or more likely, their desire to not have to follow the rules of a Lord.

If a blog mentions homosexuality, I can set my watch by the response: So you pick and choose which verses you believe? Do you eat shellfish?

True, the Old Covenant laws forbid the eating of shellfish, along with anything with a cloven hoof, thus scrapping pig from the menu. Clothing was not to be made from mixed fabrics, men could not shave the corners of their beard, and on and on.

But that doesn’t matter to me for two reasons. First, even if I am wrong for not keeping the Old Covenant laws, that doesn’t let you off the hook for not keeping them. It’s the “two wrongs don’t make a right” argument. You could point out that I am a hypocrite, but my hypocrisy doesn’t automatically make you innocent.

But more importantly, I am not under the Old Covenant. That law was replaced by the New Covenant, and even if it wasn’t, it was given to Jews and I’m a Gentile.

Hebrews 9:15 and 12:24 say that Jesus Christ became the mediator of a New Covenant; His death on the cross systematically ended the Old Covenant, and His words, “It is finished” let everyone know it. At the moment Jesus died (3:00 PM) the priest was in the temple preparing the offering in accordance with the Old Covenant when the temple veil was ripped in two from top to bottom. That veil was 60 feet high and four inches thick; God was saying, “I’m done with this old system.”

Part of the Old Covenant was moral and part was ceremonial. Nine of the Ten Commandments, which were Old Covenant, were reiterated or expounded on by Jesus (the Sabbath was the only one not reinforced). Parts of the law—like what to eat, how to dress, and how to shave—were ceremonial. They were for the outward appearance so that the Gentile world would see a difference in the Jews.

Jesus replaced the ceremonial law with this simple command: “Let your light shine before men so they may see your good works and glorify your Father in heaven (Matthew 5:16).” Instead of dressing the part, the New Covenant is about living the part.

Commands to abstain from homosexuality, however, are repeated in the New Covenant.

So yes, I can eat shellfish and bacon. Those commands are not part of the New Covenant.











Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The “Christians Hate Gays” Myth

During these Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) hearings before the Supreme Court I keep hearing how much Christians hate gay people. This was news to me since I am a Christian and I don’t hate gay people. I also go to church with over 1000 other Christians, and if any of them hate gay people, they sure haven’t told me. Before moving to South Carolina I worked at or attended several churches in Texas; prior to that I spent a decade going to church in Florida. Guess what? No one hated gay people. In fact, I don’t know any Christians who hate anybody. The very uniform of a believer is his love, and if a person does not show consistent love, then he is not actually a believer. Are there non-believers who hate gay people and claim to be Christian? Of course. But that doesn’t represent Jesus or His church. Equating  hateful sign-wavers with Christianity is like equating a kindergarten baseball team to the New York Yankees. They may claim to be playing the same

To Save a Life

(Like my blog about the peace symbol, this blog was written as a default response to all the parents, students, and other people who are asking my opinion of To Save a Life.) By now you have probably heard of the movie To Save a Life, which opened nation-wide in theaters on January 22nd. The movie deals with so many issues that teens face today, like suicide, cutting, drinking, drugs, premarital sex, teen pregnancy, and abortion. At first glance this movie looks like an awesome resource that we should recommend for our teens, parents, youth pastors, and youth workers. But a closer look at the movie reveals a few disturbing things. For starters, according to pluggedin.com, there are 2 uses of the “A” word, 5 uses of hell (used as a curse word), and once the “D” word is used. There are other crude terms used to describe a girl, and crude terms for referring to sexual activity. There is also a bedroom scene that shows a girl removing a boy’s shirt, then afterwards the girl putting he

Famous Frauds in Homosexual Science Part 2: Twin Studies

A second piece of shoddy science has been heralded as proving people are born gay. This time, instead of cadavers, living twins were studied. This study compared male identical twins to male fraternal twins; in each set of twins, at least one man was homosexual. 22% of the fraternal twins showed both brothers to be gay, compared to 52% of the identical twins. Since identical twins are closer genetically than fraternal twins, this study claimed that genetics play in to homosexuality, or that people are born gay. But an obvious question that arose from this study is, why did 48% of the identical twins only have one gay brother? If they are so close genetically, then 100% of the identical twins should have two gay brothers. This study does more harm than good to the argument from genetics. There are other factors to be considered. One is that the men doing the study (Richard Pillard and Michael Bailey) could have intentionally picked fraternal twins that the