Tommy Mann

The Bible contains thousands of names, dates, cities, rulers, genealogies, events, and scientific facts. Name one thing that has been proven wrong in the Bible. While you're thinking, let me remind you that archeology continually affirms  the Bible, and has not yet contradicted a single thing. Consider just a few of these facts  here. But other than that this picture is spot on.

(If you don't see the sarcasm here, the joke is that evolution's critics like to remind people that evolution is "just a theory.") The truth is, gravity is not "just a theory." It used to be. Now it is called the "law of gravity" because evidence has proven the theory. Evolution is still "just a theory" because there is no evidence to prove it. Even what Darwin himself said was necessary to confirm his theory has not happened. Honestly, "theory" is quite a compliment. In light of the lack of provable data, "science fiction" is more accurate.

  That's funny. The Bible actually said that the earth is round and suspended in space centuries before it was proven to be. Once again, the science confirmed the Bible, not evolution.  It is  He who sits above the circle of the earth, And its inhabitants  are  like grasshoppers Isaiah 40:22 He stretches out the north over empty space. He   hangs the earth on nothing . Job 26:7 He drew a circular horizon on the face of the waters, At the boundary of light and darkness. Job 26:10 So who is it that doesn't understand what (or Who) controls the universe? 

As I have noted in the past, one suggestion that really bothers me is the one that asserts that evolutionists have all the brilliant minds on their side while Creationists get the ones too weak-minded to make it in academia. Darwinists act as if their team has all the jocks while we get the rejects, the ones not picked to play the game. One of the weapons in their arsenal of demonizing our side is the “comfort of religion” missile. The way this one works is by pointing to our belief in God as a crutch—as something we lean on because we are too scared to come to grips with the fact that we, and life, are meaningless. So we are said to be holding onto our precious comfort of religion like a child desperately contending that Santa Claus is real, even though he is beginning to see evidence to the contrary. We lay our heads on our collective pillow, and finally drift off to sleep comforting ourselves with our religion. As atheist philosopher Paul Kurtz put it, “Re

Unexpected Love by Julie Zine Coleman is a study on “God’s heart revealed in Jesus’ conversations with women.” The book explores nine conversations that Jesus had with women during His earthly ministry; these women are Jesus’ mother, the woman with the issue of blood, the woman who anointed Jesus’ feet with her hair, the Syrophoenician woman, the woman caught in adultery, Martha, the woman at the well, Salome, and Mary Magdalene. Each chapter begins with the actual text from Scripture written out, then the author’s paraphrase of the event. I really appreciated that the Scriptural account came first, which allowed any reader not familiar with the Bible to see the biblical record first, then see the author’s thoughts. Julie’s gift for writing clearly comes through in her paraphrase of these events. After the story is set up there is a Digging Deeper section where it is obvious that the author has done an immense amount of study. In this section she includes detail

The final famous fraud that we will look at is Ernst Haeckel’s drawings of embryo development: Haeckel sketched the development of several species from embryo to adulthood. He traced the development of a salamander, fish, turtle, rabbit, chick, hog, calf, and human. The point of the chart was clear: to prove common ancestry by showing the similarities among each study in the embryonic stage. How important is this chart to evolution? Charles Darwin, who was a close friend of Haeckel, said the chart was, “by far the strongest single class of facts in favor of” evolution. [1]    Haeckel’s theory was that human embryos replay each stage of the evolutionary process before becoming human. We now know that his sketches were fake. Even his peers accused him of fraud. Not only was he a liar, he was wrong. His theory, which he called “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny,” has also been scientifically debunked. And yet his theory is used to justify abortion and embr