Skip to main content

Clinton Chronicle Interview 10/19/16



Here are my responses to the Clinton Chronicle in an interview published on October 19th. This interview was available in print but not in the online edition, so the answers are provided here.

Question 1: Why do you want to be a member of the South Carolina House of Representatives?


My reason for entering this race is simple: my heart is in it. Fifteen months ago I was waiting to see how a few factors would play out, but while I was waiting I realized this was my passion, no matter what. I learned a long time ago that when I know something is right, I need to do it. I now know that I am doing the right thing. I have an ever-growing, burning desire for the people of District 42, and I want to be used to help make a difference in any way I can.

Question 2: What is the main issue South Carolina will face over the next 12 months?


There are several critical issues facing our state that require immediate action. Repairing our infrastructure is a priority of mine, as well as seeing laws passed to guarantee First Amendment liberty in the face of the out of control Supreme Court. But the most immediate action may have to be the state retirement benefits promised to our teachers, police officers, and other state employees. We can’t pay them with promises. They deserve their pension and we have to ensure they receive what they worked for. I’m prepared to work with both parties in Columbia to find a satisfactory solution.

Question 3: Are public schools adequately funded? If not, how much more is needed?


The biggest issue with school funding is not the dollar amount, but the fact that current statues are routinely ignored. Three statutes—regarding state money, local money, and school bus funding—are being violated, in part because of the complex system currently in place. We either need to abide by the laws we have or replace them altogether. The problem isn’t just money, but in many cases is management and leadership. Some districts receive far more Base Student Cost than others, and underperform when compared to districts receiving far less BSC. This issue isn’t about dollar amounts, but about management.   

Question 4: What can the General Assembly do to promote job growth in South Carolina?

The General Assembly can help promote job growth by working with Governor Haley to promote our great state around our great country. Governor Rick Scott of Florida and Governors Rick Perry and Greg Abbot of Texas have promoted their states and successfully lured in new out of state companies. Their greatest tool is their states’ low taxes and few regulations. We need to continue to keep taxes low and free up industries to run their businesses without so much government interference. Finally, we need to advertise our state, letting CEOs and presidents know that South Carolina is open for business.  

Question 5: What should be done to fix the state's deteriorating roads and bridges? 

Our infrastructure must be immediately addressed, and we need to start with the more than one billion dollars in surplus money that is just waiting to be used on roads. We need our county councils to submit what I call Priority Plans, ranking their biggest needs first and working their way down. In Congress we have to pass a clean bill, not connected to gas tax hikes or part of any other piece of legislation. We also need to commit to put other projects on hold until this issue is solved. We can do this soon and without raising taxes.  

Question 6: Are you in favor of tax vouchers for parents of private school students? 

I absolutely support tax vouchers for parents whose children are in private school, but only if they are paying their child’s tuition. Children on scholarships or in charter schools should not qualify. The purpose of the tax break is to alleviate the double burden of paying for your own child’s education out of pocket while also paying for the public education of others. My wife and I make sacrifices to keep our daughter in private school, so I understand how this voucher can be a blessing. I also support school choice for parents who are dissatisfied with their child’s school.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The “Christians Hate Gays” Myth

During these Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) hearings before the Supreme Court I keep hearing how much Christians hate gay people. This was news to me since I am a Christian and I don’t hate gay people. I also go to church with over 1000 other Christians, and if any of them hate gay people, they sure haven’t told me. Before moving to South Carolina I worked at or attended several churches in Texas; prior to that I spent a decade going to church in Florida. Guess what? No one hated gay people. In fact, I don’t know any Christians who hate anybody. The very uniform of a believer is his love, and if a person does not show consistent love, then he is not actually a believer. Are there non-believers who hate gay people and claim to be Christian? Of course. But that doesn’t represent Jesus or His church. Equating  hateful sign-wavers with Christianity is like equating a kindergarten baseball team to the New York Yankees. They may claim to be playing the same

Famous Frauds in Homosexual Science Part 2: Twin Studies

A second piece of shoddy science has been heralded as proving people are born gay. This time, instead of cadavers, living twins were studied. This study compared male identical twins to male fraternal twins; in each set of twins, at least one man was homosexual. 22% of the fraternal twins showed both brothers to be gay, compared to 52% of the identical twins. Since identical twins are closer genetically than fraternal twins, this study claimed that genetics play in to homosexuality, or that people are born gay. But an obvious question that arose from this study is, why did 48% of the identical twins only have one gay brother? If they are so close genetically, then 100% of the identical twins should have two gay brothers. This study does more harm than good to the argument from genetics. There are other factors to be considered. One is that the men doing the study (Richard Pillard and Michael Bailey) could have intentionally picked fraternal twins that the

The Rose of Sharon and Lily of the Valley

If you have spent much time in church you have probably sung some songs with lyrics like these: “He leads me to his banqueting table, his banner over me is love… Jesus is the rock of my salvation, his banner over me is love.” “Sweetest rose of Sharon, come to set us free.” “He’s the lily of the valley, the bright and morning star…” But are those songs biblical? They come out of the writings of the Song of Solomon, but are we to understand those lines as describing Christ? The Song of Solomon is a collection of love poems that were written between two people who were deeply in love and about to be married. While we know that King Solomon is one of the writers, the other’s name has escaped us, and we know her today simply as the Shulamite woman. Some people believe that since this woman is not named then she never existed; some teach that this book is pure allegory, only existing to serve as symbolism. King Solomon, they say, represents