Skip to main content

The Clarity of the Bible


One of the great, yet often overlooked doctrines to arise from the Protestant Reformation was the belief in the clarity of Scripture (known as the doctrine of perspicuity among theologians). The world into which Martin Luther cut his teeth theologically was one in which only the religious elite were allowed to discus the meaning of the Bible. This elevation of scholasticism over the commoners in society created two class of believers: the clergy, who were permitted to talk about God, and the laity, who could only hope to be fed spoonfuls of the Gospel during the weekly service. 

 

Luther rebelled against this heresy. Being a highly educated man himself, Luther believed that the more people read the Bible for themselves, the better off they would be. He detested those who lived in their spiritual ivory towers, who turned the message of salvation into a secret reserved for those in their exclusive club. Luther was greatly aided by the advent of the printing press, and he published and distributed pamphlets as quickly as he could. One such work was given the rather lengthy title “Defense of all the Articles of M. Luther Condemned by the Latest Bull of [Pope] Leo X.” The very thought of publishing a “defense” that the common man could read was an outrage to the religious ruling class. Especially infuriated by this pamphlet was Desiderius Erasmus, a Roman Catholic scholar. 

 

Erasmus put out his own pamphlet condemning Luther. In his words, the pope and bishops were responsible for having doctrinal discussions, and it was not “proper to prostitute them before common ears,” as Luther had done. Now five hundred years later, Luther has been decided as the winner in this debate. The clarity of Scripture is an important doctrine. Brad Klassen has defined clarity as, “that quality of the biblical text that, as God’s communicative act, ensures its meaning is accessible to all who come to it in faith.” Clarity is tied to inspiration; just as we believe that the Holy Spirit inspired the Bible to give us a flawless instruction manual, we also believe that He has given us a text that we can all understand. The Bible is clear. 

 

As Christians, we are indwelled by the Holy Spirit, and He illuminates the text so that we can understand it, but even the unbeliever not yet filled with the Spirit can read John 3:16 and be led to salvation. There are certainly passages that are a little more difficult than others; some are plain on their face, while some require a little bit of digging. But those so-called problem passages do not negate the doctrine of clarity.

 

Some still argue against clarity today, taking the side of Erasmus of old. This creates a problem, for if the Bible is not clear, then we need an outside source to shine light on it. Critics of the Bible are essentially ascribing greater clarity to something else. They will say that the opinion of the learned carries more weight than a blue collar believer. Luther’s position is that the Average Joe can understand Scripture just as well as Reverend Joe. Many in this class of clergy will say that they have special understanding of Scripture, so you might thinkyou know what the Bible says, but they actually know, so at the end of the day, they are to be trusted, not you. 

 

I believe Peter settled the debate between Luther and Erasmus, and between the clergy and laity, when he wrote, “But you are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, His own special people, that you may proclaim the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His marvelous light (I Peter 2:9).” 

 

Did you get that? The church—whether clergy or lay, is part of a royal priesthood. Luther called this the priesthood of all believers. The Bible was given to us so that we can all understand it, whether young or old, educated or not. If you are a skeptic, open the Bible to the book of John and begin to read. If you are a believer, make sure you are reading too. Don’t let anyone tell you that you can’t comprehend the Bible, because it is a book of clarity. 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The “Christians Hate Gays” Myth

During these Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) hearings before the Supreme Court I keep hearing how much Christians hate gay people. This was news to me since I am a Christian and I don’t hate gay people. I also go to church with over 1000 other Christians, and if any of them hate gay people, they sure haven’t told me. Before moving to South Carolina I worked at or attended several churches in Texas; prior to that I spent a decade going to church in Florida. Guess what? No one hated gay people. In fact, I don’t know any Christians who hate anybody. The very uniform of a believer is his love, and if a person does not show consistent love, then he is not actually a believer. Are there non-believers who hate gay people and claim to be Christian? Of course. But that doesn’t represent Jesus or His church. Equating  hateful sign-wavers with Christianity is like equating a kindergarten baseball team to the New York Yankees. They may claim to be playing the same

To Save a Life

(Like my blog about the peace symbol, this blog was written as a default response to all the parents, students, and other people who are asking my opinion of To Save a Life.) By now you have probably heard of the movie To Save a Life, which opened nation-wide in theaters on January 22nd. The movie deals with so many issues that teens face today, like suicide, cutting, drinking, drugs, premarital sex, teen pregnancy, and abortion. At first glance this movie looks like an awesome resource that we should recommend for our teens, parents, youth pastors, and youth workers. But a closer look at the movie reveals a few disturbing things. For starters, according to pluggedin.com, there are 2 uses of the “A” word, 5 uses of hell (used as a curse word), and once the “D” word is used. There are other crude terms used to describe a girl, and crude terms for referring to sexual activity. There is also a bedroom scene that shows a girl removing a boy’s shirt, then afterwards the girl putting he

The Rose of Sharon and Lily of the Valley

If you have spent much time in church you have probably sung some songs with lyrics like these: “He leads me to his banqueting table, his banner over me is love… Jesus is the rock of my salvation, his banner over me is love.” “Sweetest rose of Sharon, come to set us free.” “He’s the lily of the valley, the bright and morning star…” But are those songs biblical? They come out of the writings of the Song of Solomon, but are we to understand those lines as describing Christ? The Song of Solomon is a collection of love poems that were written between two people who were deeply in love and about to be married. While we know that King Solomon is one of the writers, the other’s name has escaped us, and we know her today simply as the Shulamite woman. Some people believe that since this woman is not named then she never existed; some teach that this book is pure allegory, only existing to serve as symbolism. King Solomon, they say, represents