Skip to main content

Dealing with Anger

 

Anger can spread like wildfire. Hurt the wrong person’s feelings and wars can break out. This was perfectly illustrated in 1894 when the Boston Red Sox hosted the Baltimore Orioles. During the course of the baseball game one player lost his temper and started a fight with someone from the other team. Within seconds both dugouts cleared as the athletes and staffs engaged in a brawl out on the field. The violence carried over into the stands when one fan punched another, and soon the entire ballpark was one big riot. During the mayhem someone set fire to the bleachers, which were wooden in those days, and the entire venue was burned. The fire was not quickly contained, and when the smoke cleared, 107 buildings in Boston were impacted by the blaze.  

 

Anger can poison our minds and cause us to believe that we need to react in kind. This way of thinking can lead us to misery as we make wrong decisions in the heat of the moment. That is why Laydon Milton, in his book The Hostility Trap, referred to anger as “the chief saboteur of the mind.” Anger sabotages our minds, telling us we need to get even or lash out or hold a grudge. When we believe anger’s lies we end up making decisions that we can regret for a lifetime.   

 

Rather than letting anger sabotage our minds into an improper response, we should follow the teachings of Paul in Ephesians 4:26-27: “Be angry and do not sin; do not let the sun go down on your anger, and give no opportunity to the devil.” When we do not deal with our anger in a timely manner we give the devil an opportunity to cause the anger to turn into bitterness and hatred, which puts us in dangerous territory. We need to deal with anger right away.

 

Not letting the sun go down on our anger should not be taken so strictly; if you are angry at 7:00 in the morning, that does not mean you have twelve hours before you have to deal with it. The point is to deal with anger immediately. We deal with it by honestly telling the person how we feel, and most importantly, by forgiving the person who wronged us, whether they asked for it or not. Five verses later in Ephesians Paul wrote, “Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.” We cannot control what other people do, but forgiveness is our responsibility.

And yet some Christians think they can choose not to forgive, but the Bible never gives us that as an option. I hear people say, “I can never forgive that person. I’m going to take this to my grave.” You’re going to take it to an early grave, because your refusal to forgive is only hurting yourself. Persistent anger can lead to headaches and ulcers, even high blood pressure and heart attacks. It also robs us of the joy that Jesus came to give us. Bitterness and joy will not coexist in our hearts. 

 

It has been rightly said that not forgiving is like drinking rat poison and then waiting for the rat to die. We act as if our refusal to forgive somehow teaches the other person a lesson, but in truth they are going right on with their lives while we are the ones who are miserable. Who really has the upper hand? When we choose to forgive we move from victim to victor and we allow the peace and joy from God to rule in our lives.    

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The “Christians Hate Gays” Myth

During these Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) hearings before the Supreme Court I keep hearing how much Christians hate gay people. This was news to me since I am a Christian and I don’t hate gay people. I also go to church with over 1000 other Christians, and if any of them hate gay people, they sure haven’t told me. Before moving to South Carolina I worked at or attended several churches in Texas; prior to that I spent a decade going to church in Florida. Guess what? No one hated gay people. In fact, I don’t know any Christians who hate anybody. The very uniform of a believer is his love, and if a person does not show consistent love, then he is not actually a believer. Are there non-believers who hate gay people and claim to be Christian? Of course. But that doesn’t represent Jesus or His church. Equating  hateful sign-wavers with Christianity is like equating a kindergarten baseball team to the New York Yankees. They may claim to be playing the same

To Save a Life

(Like my blog about the peace symbol, this blog was written as a default response to all the parents, students, and other people who are asking my opinion of To Save a Life.) By now you have probably heard of the movie To Save a Life, which opened nation-wide in theaters on January 22nd. The movie deals with so many issues that teens face today, like suicide, cutting, drinking, drugs, premarital sex, teen pregnancy, and abortion. At first glance this movie looks like an awesome resource that we should recommend for our teens, parents, youth pastors, and youth workers. But a closer look at the movie reveals a few disturbing things. For starters, according to pluggedin.com, there are 2 uses of the “A” word, 5 uses of hell (used as a curse word), and once the “D” word is used. There are other crude terms used to describe a girl, and crude terms for referring to sexual activity. There is also a bedroom scene that shows a girl removing a boy’s shirt, then afterwards the girl putting he

Famous Frauds in Homosexual Science Part 2: Twin Studies

A second piece of shoddy science has been heralded as proving people are born gay. This time, instead of cadavers, living twins were studied. This study compared male identical twins to male fraternal twins; in each set of twins, at least one man was homosexual. 22% of the fraternal twins showed both brothers to be gay, compared to 52% of the identical twins. Since identical twins are closer genetically than fraternal twins, this study claimed that genetics play in to homosexuality, or that people are born gay. But an obvious question that arose from this study is, why did 48% of the identical twins only have one gay brother? If they are so close genetically, then 100% of the identical twins should have two gay brothers. This study does more harm than good to the argument from genetics. There are other factors to be considered. One is that the men doing the study (Richard Pillard and Michael Bailey) could have intentionally picked fraternal twins that the