Skip to main content

6:66

 

The number 666 has come to be associated with anything evil or relating to the end of the world. This triple six is associated with the Antichrist because Revelation 13:8 says the beast has some sort of cryptic number: “This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666.”

This code has been hotly debated for centuries, and I do not aim to weigh in on what I think the Apostle John was trying to convey; the reality is that the prophecy will make sense only to those who are alive to watch it unfold. 

 

Rather than attempting to crack the mysterious code, I want to focus on the number itself. People are always looking in every nook and cranny to find recurring sixes, and then branding that thing as the mark of the beast. For all that we do not understand, we all seem to agree that 666 is bad. So I thought it would be fun to look at the only verse in the Bible that is a 6:66, and that is found in John’s gospel (the chapter and verse numbers are man made, so please understand I am not making too much of this; I just find it to be interesting).    

 

He wrote, “After this many of His disciples turned back and no longer walked with Him.” 

 

That happened after Jesus declared Himself to be the bread of life that came down from heaven, and that people would need to feed on that bread in order to have eternal life. That statement did not sit well even with some of the disciples that were following Him (there were more than just the twelve we know by name). They followed Jesus as long as He was multiplying food and healing ailments, but this was too much.

 

Jesus essentially equated Himself with God when He said He came down from heaven. God had sent bread from heaven to nourish the wandering Israelites in the Exodus, but that manna was a temporary feeding. Jesus offered an eternal filling, something only the divine could provide. Rather than eagerly receiving this bread, many of the people who were following Jesus decided to turn back and no longer walk with Him. As far as we know, they never made a decision to trust in Jesus as their Savior. 

 

That makes the 6:66 a chilling passage. Let’s look at another 666 in the Bible, this time a 66:6 from the prophet Isaiah: “The sound of an uproar from the city! A sound from the temple! The sound of the Lord, rendering recompense to his enemies!”

 

In this verse the prophet is foretelling punishment for those who oppress God’s people. That was true in Isaiah’s time, but it will also be true in the Great Tribulation. 

 

The 6:66 shows us that some people reject Jesus because they do not believe His message, and the 66:6 shows us that those who reject Him will one day be held to account. We like to try to crack the code of Revelation’s 666, but John’s 6:66 and Isaiah’s 66:6 are straightforward. Put your trust in Jesus in order to avoid His enteral punishment. 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The “Christians Hate Gays” Myth

During these Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) hearings before the Supreme Court I keep hearing how much Christians hate gay people. This was news to me since I am a Christian and I don’t hate gay people. I also go to church with over 1000 other Christians, and if any of them hate gay people, they sure haven’t told me. Before moving to South Carolina I worked at or attended several churches in Texas; prior to that I spent a decade going to church in Florida. Guess what? No one hated gay people. In fact, I don’t know any Christians who hate anybody. The very uniform of a believer is his love, and if a person does not show consistent love, then he is not actually a believer. Are there non-believers who hate gay people and claim to be Christian? Of course. But that doesn’t represent Jesus or His church. Equating  hateful sign-wavers with Christianity is like equating a kindergarten baseball team to the New York Yankees. They may claim to be playing the same

To Save a Life

(Like my blog about the peace symbol, this blog was written as a default response to all the parents, students, and other people who are asking my opinion of To Save a Life.) By now you have probably heard of the movie To Save a Life, which opened nation-wide in theaters on January 22nd. The movie deals with so many issues that teens face today, like suicide, cutting, drinking, drugs, premarital sex, teen pregnancy, and abortion. At first glance this movie looks like an awesome resource that we should recommend for our teens, parents, youth pastors, and youth workers. But a closer look at the movie reveals a few disturbing things. For starters, according to pluggedin.com, there are 2 uses of the “A” word, 5 uses of hell (used as a curse word), and once the “D” word is used. There are other crude terms used to describe a girl, and crude terms for referring to sexual activity. There is also a bedroom scene that shows a girl removing a boy’s shirt, then afterwards the girl putting he

Famous Frauds in Homosexual Science Part 2: Twin Studies

A second piece of shoddy science has been heralded as proving people are born gay. This time, instead of cadavers, living twins were studied. This study compared male identical twins to male fraternal twins; in each set of twins, at least one man was homosexual. 22% of the fraternal twins showed both brothers to be gay, compared to 52% of the identical twins. Since identical twins are closer genetically than fraternal twins, this study claimed that genetics play in to homosexuality, or that people are born gay. But an obvious question that arose from this study is, why did 48% of the identical twins only have one gay brother? If they are so close genetically, then 100% of the identical twins should have two gay brothers. This study does more harm than good to the argument from genetics. There are other factors to be considered. One is that the men doing the study (Richard Pillard and Michael Bailey) could have intentionally picked fraternal twins that the