Skip to main content

You Will be Happy


 

About one-third of the psalms are categorized as psalms of lament; that is, they contain honest prayers from people who feel that God has treated them unfairly. The beauty of these laments is that we can probably all identify with them during difficult moments in our lives, and they usually end with a renewed perspective. For example, here are the first three verses of Psalm 13. Notice the depth of David’s anguish in his honest question to God:

 

“How long, O Lord? Will you forget me forever? How long will you hide your face from me? How long must I take counsel in my soul and have sorrow in my heart all the day? How long shall my enemy be exalted over me?” But then the psalm turns on a dime with the conjunction that begins the fifth verse:

“But I have trusted in your steadfast love; my heart shall rejoice in your salvation. I will sing to the Lord, because he has dealt bountifully with me (v.5-6).”

 

All at once he has gone from worry to worship. He has gone from pouting to praise. He has gone from crying to God to confidence in God. How? David’s better future was conditioned by his past. He speaks in the past tense, saying, “I have trusted in your steadfast love.” He does not say, “I am trusting.” Because David was already a believer in God, he was able to fall back on the firm foundation he had laid earlier in his life. The person who has never really trusted in God will struggle to do so in the middle of their problems, but the one who has made that their habit will be able to stand firm when it feels like God has hidden His face.

 

“I have trusted” is past tense, but then David shifts to the future tense. “My heart shall rejoice… I  will sing.” David knew that there was going to be a time when he would be able to rejoice, or be happy, again. He knew that one day he would pull out his harp and sing praises to his good God once more. His future was bright because his past was grounded in God. 

 

Which tense has David neglected in these two verses? We see the past and future, but no mention of the present tense can be found. That is because the present tense dominated the first four verses. Currently, when he was writing this psalm, David was down. He was wrestling with his thoughts, struggling to see the goodness of God in the darkness of his problems. The last two verses are not intended to tell us that his problems turned on the hinge of a single conjunction; rather, they tell us that David had full assurance that his problems would turn in the future. David would one day go from sadness to singing, even if not yet. 

 

So when you are struggling in the present, let your past determine your future. We are so prone to let our present determine our future, but that was not David’s formula. It might feel like God has forgotten you right now, but look back in time to when you trusted God, and let that trust be what shapes your future. You will come out of this and make it to the other side. 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The “Christians Hate Gays” Myth

During these Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) hearings before the Supreme Court I keep hearing how much Christians hate gay people. This was news to me since I am a Christian and I don’t hate gay people. I also go to church with over 1000 other Christians, and if any of them hate gay people, they sure haven’t told me. Before moving to South Carolina I worked at or attended several churches in Texas; prior to that I spent a decade going to church in Florida. Guess what? No one hated gay people. In fact, I don’t know any Christians who hate anybody. The very uniform of a believer is his love, and if a person does not show consistent love, then he is not actually a believer. Are there non-believers who hate gay people and claim to be Christian? Of course. But that doesn’t represent Jesus or His church. Equating  hateful sign-wavers with Christianity is like equating a kindergarten baseball team to the New York Yankees. They may claim to be playing the same

To Save a Life

(Like my blog about the peace symbol, this blog was written as a default response to all the parents, students, and other people who are asking my opinion of To Save a Life.) By now you have probably heard of the movie To Save a Life, which opened nation-wide in theaters on January 22nd. The movie deals with so many issues that teens face today, like suicide, cutting, drinking, drugs, premarital sex, teen pregnancy, and abortion. At first glance this movie looks like an awesome resource that we should recommend for our teens, parents, youth pastors, and youth workers. But a closer look at the movie reveals a few disturbing things. For starters, according to pluggedin.com, there are 2 uses of the “A” word, 5 uses of hell (used as a curse word), and once the “D” word is used. There are other crude terms used to describe a girl, and crude terms for referring to sexual activity. There is also a bedroom scene that shows a girl removing a boy’s shirt, then afterwards the girl putting he

Famous Frauds in Homosexual Science Part 2: Twin Studies

A second piece of shoddy science has been heralded as proving people are born gay. This time, instead of cadavers, living twins were studied. This study compared male identical twins to male fraternal twins; in each set of twins, at least one man was homosexual. 22% of the fraternal twins showed both brothers to be gay, compared to 52% of the identical twins. Since identical twins are closer genetically than fraternal twins, this study claimed that genetics play in to homosexuality, or that people are born gay. But an obvious question that arose from this study is, why did 48% of the identical twins only have one gay brother? If they are so close genetically, then 100% of the identical twins should have two gay brothers. This study does more harm than good to the argument from genetics. There are other factors to be considered. One is that the men doing the study (Richard Pillard and Michael Bailey) could have intentionally picked fraternal twins that the