Skip to main content

Hitler to Planned Parenthood Part 2


“The demand that it should be made impossible for defective people to continue to propagate defective offspring is a demand that is based on most reasonable grounds, and its proper fulfillment is the most humane task that mankind has to face.”

That detestable comment was made by none other than the Fuhrer himself, Adolf Hitler. He believed and taught that “defective” people produce defective children, and that it was the duty of the stronger Aryan race to see to it that “defective” people stopped reproducing.

Hitler also said, “Every crossing between two breeds which are not quite equal results in a…biologically lower order of being…Such mating contradicts the will of Nature towards the selective improvements of life in general.”

Will of Nature?

Selective improvements?

If this sounds like Darwinian evolution, there is a reason for that: it is. While no legitimate person would dare support the above remarks made by Hitler, millions of people adhere to (and teach our kids) Hitler’s influence, Charles Darwin.

I have previously written about how Darwin influenced Hitler (here), but notice the similarities in what Hitler said above with what Darwin wrote in The Descent of Man:

Speaking of “the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick” Darwin said “the weak members of civilized societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man…hardly anyone is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.”

There you have it. The imbeciles (Jews) propagated and injured the race of man (Germans). The natural result of this way of thinking culminated in the Final Solution—the murder of 6 million Jews.

As atrocious as the Holocaust was, that is only one facet of the point. Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” led to the belief that only the fittest should survive. This cost millions of Jews their lives. But what is equally as evil is the general devaluing of human life that Darwin gave birth to.

Once mankind stopped being created in the image of God, life had no value, and became expendable, whether in the asylum, the gas chamber, or in the womb.

(All quotes taken from Ray Comfort’s book Hitler, God, and the Bible, WND Books, pages 97-99.)

Comments

Anonymous said…
Thanks for your marvelous posting! I genuinely enjoyed reading it, you will be a great author.
I will be sure to bookmark your blog and will often come back from now on.

I want to encourage you to ultimately continue your great
posts, have a nice evening!

My web site baby bedding for girls
Also visit my web page baby girl nursery
Thank you very much for your kind words, and I'm glad you found my page. I look forward to checking out your sites.

Popular posts from this blog

The “Christians Hate Gays” Myth

During these Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) hearings before the Supreme Court I keep hearing how much Christians hate gay people. This was news to me since I am a Christian and I don’t hate gay people. I also go to church with over 1000 other Christians, and if any of them hate gay people, they sure haven’t told me. Before moving to South Carolina I worked at or attended several churches in Texas; prior to that I spent a decade going to church in Florida. Guess what? No one hated gay people. In fact, I don’t know any Christians who hate anybody. The very uniform of a believer is his love, and if a person does not show consistent love, then he is not actually a believer. Are there non-believers who hate gay people and claim to be Christian? Of course. But that doesn’t represent Jesus or His church. Equating  hateful sign-wavers with Christianity is like equating a kindergarten baseball team to the New York Yankees. They may claim to be playing the same

Famous Frauds in Homosexual Science Part 2: Twin Studies

A second piece of shoddy science has been heralded as proving people are born gay. This time, instead of cadavers, living twins were studied. This study compared male identical twins to male fraternal twins; in each set of twins, at least one man was homosexual. 22% of the fraternal twins showed both brothers to be gay, compared to 52% of the identical twins. Since identical twins are closer genetically than fraternal twins, this study claimed that genetics play in to homosexuality, or that people are born gay. But an obvious question that arose from this study is, why did 48% of the identical twins only have one gay brother? If they are so close genetically, then 100% of the identical twins should have two gay brothers. This study does more harm than good to the argument from genetics. There are other factors to be considered. One is that the men doing the study (Richard Pillard and Michael Bailey) could have intentionally picked fraternal twins that the

The Rose of Sharon and Lily of the Valley

If you have spent much time in church you have probably sung some songs with lyrics like these: “He leads me to his banqueting table, his banner over me is love… Jesus is the rock of my salvation, his banner over me is love.” “Sweetest rose of Sharon, come to set us free.” “He’s the lily of the valley, the bright and morning star…” But are those songs biblical? They come out of the writings of the Song of Solomon, but are we to understand those lines as describing Christ? The Song of Solomon is a collection of love poems that were written between two people who were deeply in love and about to be married. While we know that King Solomon is one of the writers, the other’s name has escaped us, and we know her today simply as the Shulamite woman. Some people believe that since this woman is not named then she never existed; some teach that this book is pure allegory, only existing to serve as symbolism. King Solomon, they say, represents